The Rise of Injectable Fillers in Penis Enlargement Popularity by Lisa

Half a decade ago, a casual conversation during a ‍routine cosmetic procedure ⁢sparked a revolutionary idea in ‍the mind of New York-based plastic surgeon, David ⁤Shafer. While performing ⁤filler injections on a​ woman’s face, her​ boyfriend jokingly inquired if the same could be ⁣done to his penis. Instead of‌ dismissing ⁣the idea, Shafer saw potential. Two days later, the man‍ became the first to have his penis‍ enhanced with dermal filler.

Fast‍ forward to today, ⁢and penis enlargement using the same technology that enhances lips and defines jawlines is ⁤now a common‌ procedure‍ offered ⁣by plastic ‍surgeons nationwide.⁣ Shafer’s unique ⁣method,⁢ aptly named the Shafer Width and Girth procedure ⁤(or SWAG), has gained significant popularity. “It’s become ‍a huge part of our business,” Shafer revealed. “When⁤ I first started it was one ​or two a week, then one a day, then two ⁣a day. Now it’s four ⁣or five a day.” The⁢ procedure’s ‌popularity led to the opening ⁤of⁣ an entire ⁣floor dedicated to these‍ below-the-belt injections in January.

The procedure is relatively simple and quick. ​Patients are first given an anaesthetic shot at the base of⁢ their shaft. Then, their penis is injected with hyaluronic acid-based filler. Shafer typically uses Voluma or the newer Volux brand, which are more commonly used for firmer areas of the face ‌like the cheeks and chin. Depending on the⁤ patient’s preference, this can require⁣ 10 to 20 syringes of filler, costing anywhere between $11,000 to $20,000. The‌ results start⁢ to show immediately, but the full effects are visible⁣ after about two weeks. ⁤Patients are⁣ advised to abstain from intercourse for 48 hours post-procedure.

According to Shafer, the ‍procedure makes the penis⁢ appear as if it has gained weight, similar to how an arm looks thicker after weight gain. While it doesn’t technically add length, the added weight ⁢can⁢ often create an elongated⁢ appearance.

One of Shafer’s patients, who⁢ we’ll refer to as Jason, discovered Dr Shafer​ while ⁤searching the​ Internet for penile enhancement products. “I never had⁢ any complaints​ about my⁣ size, and had what I considered‍ a healthy sex life,” he ⁤said. ‌”But I was always looking for something more. I⁤ think it’s beneficial to try to optimize ourselves, and whether it’s in the gym, or how we eat, ‍or, trying a procedure ​like this,⁤ I feel it’s a way to enhance ​what‍ we have, and just another process to become the best version⁤ of ourselves.”

Jason admitted to being nervous during his first visit but‍ still spent $12,000 on injections.⁢ He said the result speaks for itself: “Not only does ​sex feel‌ physically ⁤better, but the excitement around it is heightened due to⁤ the confidence attained.” It appears that you can, in fact, buy big dick energy: “It’s‌ walking around with this new, heavy dick ‌that truly feels amazing.”

Read more

Could Microplastics in Testicles be Causing the Fertility Crisis? by Lisa

Semen is a⁣ fascinating substance. It can hold hundreds ‌of millions of active sperm, a variety of⁣ vitamins, citric acid, prostaglandins, ⁤proteins, and ​even‍ up ⁤to 25 calories in a ‌single teaspoon.⁢ However, recent scientific studies have revealed a ‌concerning presence: plastics.

Microplastics, which are plastic particles smaller than ‍5mm, have ⁢been found in ⁣our bodies at an ⁤alarming rate in ​recent ⁤years. They have ‌been detected in our digestive systems, our blood, and ⁣even in our organs‌ such as the liver, kidneys, and heart. ⁣There is ​also evidence of microplastics in women’s uteri and ‍in the placentas of unborn babies.

Recently, a number of studies have focused on the presence of​ microplastics‌ in men’s testicles. Last year, researchers at ‍Peking University Third Hospital in‌ Beijing ‍discovered microplastics in‍ the ‍testes of⁤ four⁢ male patients and in eleven out of⁢ thirty semen samples. Italian researchers also⁢ found them⁣ in the semen ‌of six male subjects.⁤ In May, a ‍study published in Toxicological Sciences by researchers at the​ University of‌ New Mexico revealed the presence of microplastics in the testes of all 23 ‍human ‌and 47⁣ canine subjects tested.

Why dogs, you might ask? According to Chelin Hu, a researcher at the University of New ‌Mexico and the lead author of ‍the ⁤study, dogs and humans share the same living spaces‍ and have‍ shown a ⁤coinciding reduction in sperm quality over the past several decades.​ Therefore, studying​ dogs ​can provide valuable insights into the‍ effects of environmental pollutants on humans.

The study found that human subjects contained‌ microplastic concentrations three times higher than their canine counterparts. ​The types of ⁢plastic also varied, ⁣with both ⁤species containing traces of polyethylene, commonly found in food pouches and plastic films. However, the human⁣ samples also contained nylons, used in clothing fibres, ⁢and ABS, a plastic used in ⁣kitchen utensils, among other things.

So, where ⁤are these‍ microplastics coming from? The answer is disturbingly simple: everywhere. Plastics can break⁣ down due to friction, heat, UV⁤ damage, or interaction with⁣ other chemicals. We start ingesting microplastics as early as at ‌birth, ‌through IV ‌drips and ⁤baby bottles. As adults, we likely ​consume ‍them regularly in food and drinks, not just from plastic packaging, but potentially‍ from microplastics spread ⁤on farmland in fertiliser. We may even ⁢be inhaling a ‍significant amount of microplastics.

With microplastics ⁣now‍ found inside us, the urgent task is to determine the potential damage they might be causing. According to Matt Simon,‍ an editor at Grist‌ and the author of A Poison Like⁣ No Other: How Microplastics Corrupted Our Planet and Our‌ Bodies, microplastics ‌pose three potential threats. The first is the physical ‌plastic particle itself, which​ can get stuck in the lungs, similar⁣ to asbestos. ‍Workers in synthetic textile factories have been ‌found to have​ a lot of ⁣these‍ in their lungs ⁤and had higher rates of​ respiratory and digestive cancers. A recent ‌study also found that patients with microplastics in a crucial artery were 4.5 times more ⁤likely to experience a⁤ heart attack,‌ stroke, or die afterwards than those without.

Read more